Wow. Glad I subscribed to you earlier.

I’ve been (painfully) aware of a lot of the information you presented, but you managed to put in bits and pieces I hadn’t come across. The data regarding Flight 77 and how the cockpit door was never opened, is extremely compelling.

However, I didn’t find what I hoped would be an explanation for what exactly crashed into the Pentagon that day. Clearly it wasn’t a plane, so what was it? Much of the evidence is pointing towards it being a missile, although that doesn’t jibe with the testimony you included of Cheney watching the “plane” gradually approach the most highly defended and surveiled institution on the planet.

It also doesn’t make sense why Flight 93 was shot down (as the evidence strongly suggests) but 77 was left untouched.

I also don’t know why a missile might have been used instead of a plane. This data is difficult to reconcile given the narrative of hijacked planes. Although, surprisingly, there is no clear video of a plane in spite of the many cameras in and around the Pentagon.

One thing I remember early in those days was when employees of a nearby hotel had their security footage confiscated shortly after the attack, because they had a rooftop camera pointed at the Pentagon. They apparently were “horrified” when reviewing the video.

Clearly we aren’t meant to be seeing what really happened. Dozens of cameras and all we get are a few frames of video taken off a security gate where a blob passes through, not looking much like a plane at all.

But why the missile? I’ve never been able to explain the reason for it. Not sure if that’s a suspicion of yours as well.